Ambiguity and Abstraction in Bob Dylan's Lyrics
Z WikiSennik
IndiraejcjcshsxqPochatko (dyskusja | wkład)
(Nowa strona: Also lots of people modern poetry is often a turn-off. The purpose for this is that the majority of these poems are boring. They may be so because they fail to allow men and women to de...)
następna edycja →
Wersja z dnia 17:30, 10 lip 2012
Also lots of people modern poetry is often a turn-off. The purpose for this is that the majority of these poems are boring. They may be so because they fail to allow men and women to determine with them. The bulk of modern poetry is no longer about reader identification but about information and facts transfer, details that could just as very easily be conveyed in a prose form. These poems are written merely to convey the poet's thoughts and feelings about a certain occasion, situation or spot he or she has skilled or is within the act of experiencing. The poet is just not necessarily concerned with no matter whether the reader is moved or not by the poem, so long as he or she understands clearly the info the poet is attempting to convey. This may perhaps consist of some "important" insight gained from an experience, or it may be (as is ordinarily the case) a jaded statement or commentary about some mundane aspect of contemporary life.
The well known song at its very best, however, does more than this. It excites each the imagination and emotions; it enables you to unlock your personal extremely individual box of images, memories, connections and associations. This can be most readily evidenced in the songs of Bob Dylan . Even essentially the most perfunctory of his songs is able to do that to a greater extent than most "serious" poetry. This really is mainly because his songs (and to a lesser extent songs in general) regularly utilise imprecise and abstract statements in lieu of certain and distinct ones. Modern poetry, on the other hand, does the exact opposite of this: it utilises distinct and distinct statements in lieu of imprecise and abstract ones.
Dylan is not afraid to generalise, for he knows that it is actually only by way of generalisation that the reader can recognise the precise. Keats understood this when he said that a poem 'should surprise by a fine excess, and not by singularity' and that 'it should strike the reader as a wording of his own highest thoughts, and appear virtually as a remembrance' (letter to John Taylor , 27 February 1818).
David Bleich, in Readings and Feelings champions the creative powers on the reader. He believes writing about literature should not involve suppressing readers' individual concerns, anxieties, passions and enthusiasms since 'each person's most urgent motivations are to know himself'. And as a response to a literary perform usually assists us discover some thing about ourselves, introspection and spontaneity are to be encouraged. Each and every act of response, he says, reflects the shifting motivations and perceptions in the reader at the moment of reading, as well as essentially the most idiosyncratic and autobiographical response for the text must be heard sympathetically. Within this way the reader is in a position to construct, or build, a private exegesis by utilising the linguistic permutations inherent inside the text to construct units of which means constituted from a predominantly autobiographical frame of reference. The ambiguities present in Dylan's oeuvre enable the listener to perform precisely this.
